Tutor vs. Automatic Focused Feedback and Grading of Student ESP Compositions in an Online Learning Environment

Allen, L. K., Jacovina, M. E., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). Computer-based writing instruction. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 316-329). The Guilford Press.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.

Bárcena Madera, E., Martín-Monje, E., & Jordano de la Torre, M. (2016). Methodological and technological innovation in distance teaching of English for tourism. Iberica, 2016(31), 39-61.

Barrantes Montero, L. (2009). A brief view of the ESP approach. LETRAS, 46, 125-143. https://doi.org/10.15359/rl.2-46.7

Bird, B., Downs, D., McCracken, I. M., & Rieman, J. (Eds.). (2019). Next steps: New directions for/in writing about writing. University Press of Colorado.

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 409-431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089924

Bruton, A. (2009). The vocabulary knowledge scale: A critical analysis. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6, 288-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15434300902801909

Boulton, A. (2017). Research timeline: Corpora in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 50(4), 483-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000167

Boulton, A., & Cobb, T. (2017). Corpus use in language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 67(2), 348–393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lang.12224

Council of Europe. (2018). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume with new descriptors.

Crossley, S. A. (2020). Linguistic Features in writing quality and development: An overview. Journal of Writing Research, 11, 415-443. Https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.11.03.01

Curado, a. (2017). Form-focused data-driven learning for grammar development in ESP contexts. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 23(1), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.20420/rlfe.2016.327

Dağ Akbaş, R. (2021). A systematic review of the ESP (English for specific purposes)-based post-graduate research in Turkey. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22, 12-31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357735869_A_systematic_review_of_the _ESP_English_for_specific_purposes-based_post-graduate_research_in_Turkey

Díez-Arcón, P., & Martín-Monje, E. (2021). G-Rubric: The use of open technologies to provide personalized feedback in languages for specific purposes, in Edulearn21 Proceedings, 2635-2643. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2021.0574

Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x

Fleckenstein, J., Leucht, M., & Köller, O. (2018). Teachers’ judgement accuracy concerning CEFR levels of prospective university students. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(1), 90-101.

Fletcher-Wood, H. (2021). Habits of success: Getting every student learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003010074

Flowerdew, J. (2016). English for specific academic purposes (ESAP) writing: Making the case. Writing & Pedagogy, 8(1), 5-32.

Fox, J. & Arteneva, N. (2017). From diagnosis toward academic support: Developing a disciplinary, ESP-based writing task and rubric to identify the needs of entering undergraduate engineering students. ESP Today, 57, 148-171.

Ghanbar, H., & Rezvani, R. (2024). Four decades of publications in English for specific purposes: Mapping the trajectory of empirical research. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 32-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.22055/rals.2023.44222.3102

Harris, Z. (1968). Mathematical structures of language. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Hernández Benítez, M. H., & Santamaría Lancho, M. (2016). G-Rubric: Una aplicación para corrección automática de preguntas abiertas. Primer balance de su utilización. In Nuevas perspectivas en la investigación docente de la historia económica (pp. 473-494). Editorial de la Universidad de Cantabria.

Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2022). English for specific purposes: What is it and where is it taking us? ESP Today, 10(2), 202-220. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2022.10.2.1

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge University Press. https://doi:10.1017/CBO9781139524742

Jorge-Botana, G., Olmos, R. & Luzón, J.M. (2019). Bridging the theoretical gap between semantic representation models without the pressure of a ranking: some lessons learnt from LSA. Cognitive Processing, 21, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-019-00934-x

Kao, C.-W., & Reynolds, B. L. (2016). Analyses of EFL teacher feedback on word choice errors from an on-line writing platform. The Academic Conference of Foreign Language Teaching and Intercultural Studies, May, 35-51.

Karpenko-Seccombe, T. (2020). Academic writing with corpora: A resource book for data-driven learning. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429059926

Keuning, H., Jeuring, J., & Heeren, B. (2018). A systematic literature review of automated feedback generation for programming exercises. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 19(1), 1-43.

Kittredge, R. (1982). Variation and homogeneity of sublanguages, In R. Kittredge & J. Lehrberger (Eds.), Sublanguage: Studies of Language in Restricted Semantic Domains, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 107-137.

Knight, S., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Gibson, A., Buckingham Shum, S. (2017). Towards mining sequences and dispersion of rhetorical moves in student written texts. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference (LAK '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 228-232. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027433

Knight, S., Shibani, A., Abel, S., Gibson, A., Ryan, P., Sutton, N., Wight, R., Lucas, C., Sándor, Á., Kitto, K., Liu, M., Vijay Mogarkar, R., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2020). Acawriter: A learning analytics tool for formative feedback on academic writing. Journal of Writing Research, 12(1), 141-186. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.12.01.06Kurdi

Limpo, T., Nunes, A., & Coelho, A. (2020). Introduction to the special issue on technology-based writing instruction: A collection of effective tools. Journal of Writing Research, 12(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.12.01.01

Lumley, T. (2002). Assessment criteria in a large-scale writing test: What do they really mean to the raters? Language Testing, 19(3), 246-276. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt230oa

Martín-Monje, E. & Castrillo, M.D. (2021, May 12). Data driven learning en entornos de aprendizaje formales e informales. XI Jornadas de Investigación en Innovación Docente de la UNED. (online conference). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAajXIK6vrA

Martín-Monje, E. & Castrillo, M.D. (2022). Data-driven learning to improve writing skills in foreign languages. In K.D. Rossade, J. Janssen, C. Wood, & G. Ubachs, Designing Online Assessment — Solutions that are Rigorous, Trusted, Flexible and Scalable. Maastricht: EADTU.

Miao, Y., Badger, R., & Zhen, Y. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing Class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004

Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2019). Second language learning theories. (4^th ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315617046

Roscoe, R.D., Allen, L.K., Weston, J.L., Crossley, S.A. & McNamara, D.S. (2014). The writing pal intelligent tutoring system: Usability testing and development. Computers and Composition, 34(1), 39-59.

Sadler, R. (2010) Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535-550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541015

Smelstor, M. (1978). A guide to teaching the importance of audience and subject. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED176274

Stevenson, M. & Phakiti, A. (2019). The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing. Assessing Writing, 19, 51-65.

Swales, J. M. (2000). Languages for specific purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500200044

Trace, J., Hudson, T., & Brown, J. D. (Eds.). (2015). Developing courses in languages for specific purposes. National Foreign Language Resource Center.

Van Beuningen, C. (2021). Focused versus unfocused corrective feedback: from part IV-feedback provider, feedback intensity, and feedback timing. In The Cambridge handbook of corrective feedback in second language learning and teaching (pp. 300-321). Cambridge University Press.

Wang Z, Han F. (2022). The effects of teacher feedback and automated feedback on cognitive and psychological aspects of foreign language writing: A mixed-methods research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 909802. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.909802

Warren, M. J. (2015). Introduction to data-driven learning. In F. Farr & L. Murray (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language learning and technology. Routledge.

Wilson, J., Ahrendt, C., Fudge, E.A., Raiche, A., Beard, G., & MacArthur, C. (2021). Elementary teachers' perceptions of automated feedback and automated scoring: Transforming the teaching and learning of writing using automated writing evaluation. Computers & Education, 168, 104208.