Effect of Input vs. Collaborative Output Tasks on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Grammatical Accuracy and Willingness to Communicate

Allen, L. (2004). The Oxford placement test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Arbuckle, L. J. (2007). Amos™ 16.0 user’s guide. USA, Chicago: Amos Development Corporation.

Campillo, P. S. (2006). Focus of form tasks and the provision of the corrective feedback. Iberica, 12, 123-138.

Cetinkaya, Y. B. (2005). Turkish collage students’ willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University.

DeKeyser, R., Salaberry, R., Robinson, P., & Harrington, M. (2002). What gets processed in processing instruction? A commentary on Bill VanPatten’s ‘Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 805-23.

Dalili, M. V., Ketabi, S., Kassaian, Z., & Eslami Rasekh, A. (2011). The effect of textual enhancement on system learning of English dative alternation. World Applied Sciences, 15, 63-69.

Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2^nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Farahani, A, Kh., & Sarkhosh, M. (2012).Do different textual enhancement formats have differential effects on the intake of English subjunctive mood? Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4), 688-698.

Forouzandeh, F. (2013). On the relationship between L2 learners’ metaphorical competence and their intrapersonal intelligence. LEARN Journal, 6(1), 1-14.

Krashen, S. (1993). The effect of formal grammar teaching: Still peripheral. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 722-25.

Lee, S, K. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students’ reading and learning of passive form. Language Learning, 57(1), 87-118.

Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Long, M. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R. D. Lambert & E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language policy and pedagogy: Essays in honor of A. Ronald Walton (pp. 179-92). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.15-41). New York: Cambridge University Press.

MacIntyre, P. (1994). Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A casual analysis. Communication Research Reports, 11, 135-142.

MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 369-388.

MacIntyre, P., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 3-26.

MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. (1998). Conceptualizing   willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562.

MacIntyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 149-171.

Nassaji, H. (1999). Towards integrating form-focused instruction and communicative interaction in the second language classroom: Some pedagogical possibilities. Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 385-402.

Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2004). Current developments in research on the teaching of grammar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 126-45.

Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Nassaji, H., & Tian, J. (2010). Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research, 14, 397-419.

Oruc, N. (2012). Dictogloss: The role of reconstruction tasks on noticing. INONU University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 13(2), 43-56.

Peng, J., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60(4), 834-876.

Richard, J, C., & Hull, J., & Proctor, S. (2013). New interchange, book 2. Cambridge:  Cambridge University Press.

Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. New York:  Palgrave-Macmillan.

Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Storch, N. (1998). A classroom based study: Insights from a collaborative text reconstruction task. ELT Journal, 7(4), 176-91.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some rules of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-53). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In H. G. Widdowson, G. Cook, & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain(Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.99-118). Harlow: Longman.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285-304.

VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 755-803.

Vatankhah, M. (2013).Exploring willingness to communicate in English in the Iranian context: Language learning orientations and social support. Unpublishedmaster’s thesis,Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wang, Y. (2004). The relationship between second language written performance and the level of willingness to communicate in class: A quantitative analysis of second-year Chinese class 2004 at the Australian National University. Paper presented at the 15^thBiennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association ofAustralia, Canberra, Australia.

Wang, Y. J., & Erlam, R. (2011). Willingness to communicate in the Japanese language classroom: An inquiry learning project in a year 7 classroom. The New Zealand Language Teacher, 37, 39-44.