
تعداد نشریات | 31 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,029 |
تعداد مقالات | 9,099 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 10,294,814 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,530,771 |
Form and Meaning in the Story of «the Romans and Chinese Argument on the Painting Science» by Rumi, Compared to Anish Kapoor's «Mirror of the Sky» | ||
Paykareh | ||
مقاله 5، دوره 11، شماره 29، اسفند 2022، صفحه 59-70 اصل مقاله (862.03 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22055/pyk.2022.17886 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Mohammad Samii1؛ Mohamad Reza Hassani* 2؛ Marziyeh Rezaei3 | ||
1Department of Painting, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Sistan and Baluchistan, Zahedan, Iran. | ||
2Department of Painting, Faculty of Arts and Architecture, University of Sistan and Baluchistan, Zahedan, Iran. | ||
3Department, of Handicrafts,, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Sistan and Baluchistan, Zahedan, Iran. | ||
چکیده | ||
Problem Definition: The issue of form and meaning has always been an integral part of the foundations of art forming an artwork. Also, Rumi has discussed the subtle relationship between form and meaning in the story of «Romans and Chinese» from a mystical point of view. On the other hand, Anish Kapoor's «Mirror of the Sky», which has a special place in contemporary art as a large-scale work, has common points compared to Rumi's point of view. The present research tries to address these points and investigate the significance of how and with what common language, form and meaning are studied in these works, which are in many historical contrasts? Objective: Rumi attended to the subject of meaning far beyond his time. This feature has made it very close to the language of contemporary art. Therefore, the current research is trying to achieve a new concept by comparing the value of meaning in the story «the Romans and Chinese Argument on the Painting Science» by Rumi and «The Mirror of the Sky» by Anish Kapoor, in a way that is also related to the language of contemporary art. Research Method: The current research has been conducted in a descriptive-analytical method and, by referring to library sources, it has expressed the concepts of form and meaning in contemporary art and their place and relationship in Islamic thought and mysticism. Results: The results showed that the story of «the Romans and Chinese Argument on the Painting Science» and the work of «Mirror of the Sky» have tried to highlight the importance of meaning so much that it has even led to the removal of form. These two works are very close to each other in terms of form, but their semantic language differs from each other according to the context of the time in which they are placed | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Meaning؛ Mysticism؛ Anish Kapoor؛ Painting؛ Rumi | ||
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
مراجع | ||
- آدامز، لوری. (۱۳۸۸). روش شناسی هنر (ترجمۀ علی معصومی). تهران: نشر نظر.
- اربابی، هدا. (۱۳۹۱). اعجاب هنر یا هنر اعجاب. نشریۀ حرفۀ هنرمند، (43)، صص. 60-70.
- بابا، هومی. (۱۳۹۱). ابژههای فرار (ترجمۀ احسان نوروزی). نشریه حرفۀ هنرمند، (43)، صص. 72-80.
- بلخاری قهی، حسن. (۱۳۹۰). فلسفۀ هنر اسلامی. تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
- بختیاری، محمود. (۱۳۷۸). عارفان راز. تهران: نشر رهیاب.
- پازوکی، شهرام. (۱۳۹۲). حکمت هنر و زیبایی در اسلام. تهران: نشر فرهنگستان هنر.
- جعفری، محمدتقی. (۱۳۷۰). تفسیر و نقد و تحلیل مثنوی جلال الدین محمد بلخی. تهران: نشر اسلامی.
- غزالی، محمد. (۱۳۵۲). احیاء علوم الدین (ترجمه حسین خدیوجم). تهران: بنیاد فرهنگ ایران.
- کالینسون، دایانه. (۱۳۸۸). تجربۀ زیباشناختی (ترجمۀ فریده فرنودفر). تهران: نشر فرهنگستان هنر.
- مددپور، محمد. (۱۳۸۷). حکمت انسی و زیباییشناسی عرفانی هنر اسلامی. تهران: انتشارات سورۀ مهر.
- هرست هاوس، رزالین. (۱۳۸۸). بازنمایی و صدق (ترجمۀ امیر نصری). تهران: نشر فرهنگستان هنر.
- همتی، همایون. (۱۳۸۷). فهم هنر و هنر فهم. تهران: نشر پرسش. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 407 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 426 |